Archive for November, 2009

reiterating : 1st adment, not a license to be a jackass, global warming emails, Net Neutrality

the BILL has redefined net neutrality to allow the government to regulate content, in the issues of “fairness” another code word for regulation . .

Network neutrality (also net neutrality, Internet neutrality) is a principle proposed for user access networks participating in the Internet that advocates no restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed, as well as communication that is not unreasonably degraded by other traffic.[1][2][3]

The principle states that if a given user pays for a certain level of Internet access, and another user pays for a given level of access, that the two users should be able to connect to each other at the subscribed level of access.

Though the term did not enter popular use until several years later, since the early 2000s advocates of net neutrality and associated rules have raised concerns about the ability of broadband providers to use their last mile infrastructure to block Internet applications and content (e.g. websites, services, protocols), particularly those of competitors. In the US particularly, but elsewhere as well, the possibility of regulations designed to mandate the neutrality of the Internet has been subject to fierce debate.

Neutrality proponents claim that telecom companies seek to impose a tiered service model in order to control the pipeline and thereby remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and oblige subscribers to buy their otherwise uncompetitive services. Many believe net neutrality to be primarily important as a preservation of current freedoms.[4] Vinton Cerf, considered as a “father of the Internet” and co-inventor of the Internet Protocol, Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the web, and many others have spoken out in favor of network neutrality.
————————-

IE: internet is the wild west and should stay that way .
____________________________________

Global warming emails

what these showed us was that the scientists, Mann , did not employ scientific method.

My favorite article on this :

http://www.sundriesshack.com/2009/11/25/the-cru-scandals-real-crime-against-science/

The CRU Scandal’s Real Crime Against Science.

——

as far as global warming existing

we already know that no one has being about to duplicate this scams results . now we just have proof as to why.. it was a scam.

If George Bush had


If George Bush had:

* been the first President to need a teleprompter installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how he inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

* spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

* reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

* made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

* given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

* given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

* bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?
* visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

* filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?
* been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

* mis-spelled the word “advice” would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what a dunce he is?

* burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?

* failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

* created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved.

* ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?

* proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

* then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

* If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive?
Can’t think of anything?
Don’t worry. He had done all this in his first 5 months -

unattributed but true

freedom of speech is not “carte blanche” to be a jack ass

just needed to get that off my chest .

this has been a common theme with idiots not listening to what is being said and jumping into the wrong side and an argument and fighting with there allies.

i saw  at the nov 5th march  issues  alone these lines

with people not listening and fighting with their allies

over really stupid semantics .

look there is a difference between  people not understanding the meaning of a word/point or being a made up word/point,…. and having it have multiple meanings  ..

example

civil rights and human rights mean very different things  and are NOT interchangeable.

civil rights :have to  do with the rights of SOVEREIGNS of a particular nation

human rights :are general guidelines  set up by the U.N. their are NOT enforceable laws .

illegal aliens ,terrorists  ,enemy combatants , and spy’s do not have “civil rights” in the united states, they are not protected by our Constitution, because they are not here either legally or as documented guests ,and can only be judged by MILITARY tribunal.

Next Page »