<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paint's Blog &#187; term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/category/term/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>mary-margaret conley \</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>using the term &#8220;net neutrality&#8221; to &#8220;sell&#8221; more government restrictions.</title>
		<link>http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1274</link>
		<comments>http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1274#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glenn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[term]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweetre-defining terms to fool the voter &#8220;What&#8217;s the risk? For one thing, &#8220;ancillary&#8221; jurisdiction could also be applied, as the EFF points out, to the creation of new Internet decency standards. (Congress has tried repeatedly to regulate Internet content since 1996, only to be overturned by the courts.) The same FCC that now casts itself [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1274/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Jeffersons idea of selecting the Senate</title>
		<link>http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1231</link>
		<comments>http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1231#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paint</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jefferson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repersentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[termlimit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/index.htm http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/P/tj3/writi&#8230; You seem to have misapprehended my proposition for the choice of a Senate. I had two things in view: to get the wisest men chosen, &#38; to make them perfectly independent when chosen. I have ever observed that a choice by the people themselves is not generally distinguished for it&#8217;s wisdom. This [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://paintbrush12.com/wordpress/archives/1231/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

