Paint’s Blog

iKarith Wrote:
Solution: Vote. In primaries. For people who will not compromise us closer to destruction. Vote for well-spoken men and women of character who understand the risks we face if we get it wrong at this late hour. Vote for people whose compassion is genuine, but whose resolve is unshakable. Vote for people who understand that we can’t fix it in a day, but that it must be fixed and that the process needs to begin a decade ago. Vote for candidates who know how close we are to losing the light of liberty in our lifetimes and will work hard to restore it, one liberty at a time if necessary, until We The People are once again sovereign.

Do not vote for the gladhander who will say what you want to hear until he has your vote. Do not vote for the loudmouth who does more to incite a crowd than to lead them. Do not vote for the dispassionate idealist because he cannot cope with reality. Do not vote for the fanatic for whom no barrier would be an impediment because We The People are supposed to be such a barrier.

And most importantly, do not vote for the incumbent just because you don’t think he’s done anything wrong. Now is the time to demand of our government that they prove they have earned the office we have given them. If they haven’t been doing our work, they need to get out. And there should be no sacred cows—even Ron Paul (a dispassionate idealist if ever there was one, Obama’s polar opposite) needs to fear that if he can’t pull his head out of his ass and take action to stop the destruction of our country, then he should be replaced by someone who will.

Pictures

Commentary

http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/index.htm

http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/P/tj3/writi…

You seem to have misapprehended my proposition for the choice of a Senate. I had two things in view: to get the wisest men chosen, & to make them perfectly independent when chosen. I have ever observed that a choice by the people themselves is not generally distinguished for it’s wisdom. This first secretion from them is usually crude & heterogeneous. But give to those so chosen by the people a second choice themselves, & they generally will chuse wise men. For this reason it was that I proposed the representatives (& not the people) should chuse the Senate, & thought I had notwithstanding that made the Senators (when chosen) perfectly independant of their electors. However I should have no objection to the mode of election proposed in the printed plan of your committee, to wit, that the people of each county should chuse twelve electors, who should meet those of the other counties in the same district & chuse a senator. I should prefer this too for another reason, that the upper as well as lower house should have an opportunity of superintending & judging of the situation of the whole state & be not all of one neighborhood as our upper house used to be. So much for the wisdom of the Senate. To make them independent, I had proposed that they should hold their places for nine years, & then go out (one third every three years) & be incapable for ever of being re-elected to that house. My idea was that if they might be re-elected, they would be casting their eye forward to the period of election (however distant) & be currying favor with the electors, & consequently dependant on them. My reason for fixing them in office for a term of years rather than for life, was that they might have in idea that they were at a certain period to return into the mass of the people & become the governed instead of the governor which might still keep alive that regard to the public good that otherwise they might perhaps be induced by their independance to forget.