Paint’s Blog

 I am still posting all the videos:but these should get ya started as I Add the rest of the girls on the range.(you’ll have to forgive me my internet is still really slow)So the first gun.my GREAT grandfathers Iver Johnson Target Model 55. It’s a .22,8 shot .Well after the range last night I called my father to tell him that I finally got to test out grandpas gun, he was so happy.Told him it’s a nice little revolver, but it pulls a little north, Dads voice took on that kinda nostalgic tone.I wish he was out here I think a good days shooting would be fun.MOM. on the other hand .I really didn’t even want mom to know I was at the range .Mom was significantly less then happy.The second Gun:is a Kimber 1911 .45.This is the gun I was taught on.We were shooting with 6, 7 and 10 round mags , and Dc0de likes to mix duds in randomly to teach proper clearing on misfire.my husband receiving the same basic training got from my good friend Dc0de.BTW I  LOVE that 1911 and it’s a planned purchase some time latter this year .and now a montage

Savannah to Washington DC for Thursday, (Sav to DC)

if i drive i need peeps to cover gas .
can fit 2 more people .
so if 2 come . it’s 60.00 each for the ride.
i’ll drive

if your going I have no money to give you .
but can barter work for the trade .(graphic design, editing, art, logo design, baby sitting, pet sitting, computer work, pc/ mac/ linux repair ect)
plus i get to bitch at Watson, Babs Boxer and Frankenstein . because there still my reps since I’m technically a CA resident..

would you just LOVE to be able to give them a piece of your mind?
12 hours to help compose a “talk” to them with me .

re-defining terms to fool the voter

“What’s the risk? For one thing, “ancillary” jurisdiction could also be applied, as the EFF points out, to the creation of new Internet decency standards. (Congress has tried repeatedly to regulate Internet content since 1996, only to be overturned by the courts.) The same FCC that now casts itself as savior of the open network, after all, has grown increasingly aggressive and prudish in policing content in its traditional job as regulator of over-the-air television. A federal court, for example, recently threw out the $550,000 fine levied in the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction case from the 2004 Super Bowl. ”

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-10385865-94.html